Date Filed | Summary | Pages |
10/08/1993 | Supreme Court Case No. 92-2380 returned. (Vols. 2 of 2) | 0 |
09/15/1993 | Tariff sheets PUCO No. 6 check sheet 1, section D, second revised sheets 1,2,and 3, section F, seventeenth revised sheet 2 filed on behalf of United Telephone by J. Ludenia. | 0 |
08/30/1993 | Revised tariff, PUCO No. 2, Section 1 - 3rd page 10, filed on behalf of applicant by E. Napier. | 0 |
08/25/1993 | Revised tariff, PUCO No. 2, Section 1 - 3rd page 10, filed on behalf of respondent, Cincinnati Bell, by R. Sigmon. | 0 |
12/29/1992 | Supreme Court Transmittal Papers submitted. | 0 |
11/30/1992 | Notice of appeal on Entry on Rehearing, filed on behalf of the Morrow Chamber of Commerce and numerous other sub- scribers, by L. Porter. | 0 |
11/25/1992 | Notice of appeal filed on behalf of the Complainants by L. Kathleen Porter. | 0 |
10/01/1992 | Entry denying complainant's application for rehearing. | 0 |
09/23/1992 | Memorandum contra to complainants' application for rehearing filed on behalf of the United Telephone Company by T. Jacobs. | 0 |
09/21/1992 | Memorandum contra application for rehearing, filed on behalf of respondent, Cincinnati Bell, by M. Longenecker, Jr. | 0 |
09/08/1992 | Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of complainants by L. Porter. | 0 |
09/02/1992 | Letter stating that the proposed implementation date for two-way measured-rate extended area service between Morrow and Cincinnati and Little Miami is September 11, 1993, filed on behalf of respodent, United Telephone, by J. Ludenia. | 0 |
08/06/1992 | Opinion & Order denying the request for two-way flat-rate EAS between the involved exchanges and granting two-way measured-rate EAS be instituted by December, 1993. | 0 |
07/20/1992 | Motion to withdraw hearing request by complainants and informational response filed on behalf of complainants by L. Porter. | 0 |
06/10/1992 | Informational response of Morrow Chamber of Commerce, Judith A. Stopkotte, representative, filed by L. Porter. | 0 |