Skip to main content

Case Record For:

87-1198-TP-CSS

File a Public Comment
Case Title: CARPET COLOR SYS/OHIO BELL TEL CO
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: CSS-Complaint on service or safety
Date Opened: 8/13/1987
Date Closed: 6/28/1990
Printable Docket Card Service List
View All
1 - 15 of 15 documents 1 /  1 
Date FiledSummaryPages
06/28/1990Entry dismissing case.0
06/11/1990Letter requesting that complaint be dismissed without prejudice filed on behalf of complainant by S. Randazzo.0
04/06/1990Entry ordering that the complainant file a motion or other appropriate documentation setting forth the manner in which it wishes to proceed in this matter by 6/5/90. (AE)0
03/13/1990Entry scheduling pre-hearing conference on 4/5/90 at l0:00 a.m. at the offices of the Commission. (AE)0
03/02/1988Trans., for hearing held on 2/16/88, (RM) Submitted Vol. I, 1-3 pages.0
02/11/1988Entry ordering that the joint request for continuance is granted and the hearing continued indefinitely. (AE)0
02/03/1988Letter filed by S. Randazzo on behalf of Ohio Bell and Carpet Color Systems, RE: to continuing hearing.0
01/29/1988Proof of Publication filed (Franklin County)0
01/13/1988Legal notice sent to the Columbus Dispatch (Franklin County)0
10/14/1987Entry denying complainant's motion for interim relief and scheduling case for hearing February 16, 1988 at 10:00 a.m., at the offices of the Commission.0
09/08/1987Carpert Color System's reply to the Ohio Bell Telephone Companyt's memorandum contra filed by S. Randazzo.0
09/04/1987Answer of The Ohio Bell Telephone Company filed by C. Rawlings.0
08/28/1987Memorandum of The Ohio Bell Telephone Company contra complainant's motion for interim emergency relief filed by M. Graft and C. Rawlings.0
08/13/1987Memorandum in Support of Motion for Interim Emergency Relief filed by S. Randazzo on behalf of complainant.0
08/13/1987Complaint of Carpet Color Systems (Vs) Ohio Bell Telephone Company, RE: to the alleged, unreasonable, unjust and inadequate telecommunications service or facilities to CCS; has, in effect, abandoned service to CCS without obtaining prior authorization from the PUCO.0
 
1 /  1 
      
      
Attorney General:
Attorney Examiner: