DIS - Case Record for 87-0206-TP-COI Skip to main content

Case Record For:

87-0206-TP-COI

File a Public Comment
Case Title: COMMUNICATIVELY IMPAIRED SERVICE
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: COI-Commission inquiry
Date Opened: 2/4/1987
Date Closed:
Printable Docket Card Service List
View All
1 - 15 of 359 documents 1 /  24 
Date FiledSummaryPages
06/11/1996Requisite bill insert filed on behalf of Sprint by A. Web- ster. (2 pgs.)2
12/21/1995Entry ordering that the PUCO's November 2, 1995 entry is hereby clarified to state that Ohio's relay service provider and all other carriers operating within the state of Ohio shall be permitted to choose either a calling card or a prepaid debit card, or both, as the billing method(s) to be utilized pursuant to the payphone toll call requirement of the alternative plan mandated by the FCC in its August 25, 1995 order; that, with the exception of the clarification establishing in Finding 6, and further promulgated by this entry, all other Ohio-specific requirements set forth in the PUCO's November 2, 1995 entry remain in effect. (4 pgs.)4
12/04/1995Application for rehearing and/or clarification filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (17 pgs.)17
11/02/1995Entry ordering that Ohio's relay service provider and all common carriers operating within the state of Ohio shall be in compliance with the alternative plan set forth in the FCC's August 25, 1995 Memorandum Opinion and Order by no later than 11/26/95; that all payphone toll calls placed through the Ohio Relay Center and billed to a calling card or debit card shall be charged the lesser of either the actual card rates, or the coin-sent paid rates that would apply to a similar non-relay call; that all payphone toll calls place through the Ohio Relay Center and billed to a calling card or debit card shall be appropriately discounted according to the MTS policy set forth in this case; that all payphone EAS calls placed through the Ohio Relay Center shall be treated as local calls, and shall therefore be free of charge. (6 pgs.)6
06/30/1995Requisite bill filed on behalf of Sprint by A. Webster. (3 pgs.)0
07/22/1993Requisite bill insert filed on behalf of Sprint by A. Webster.0
06/29/1993Letter stating that the AOS customer list for One Call Communications, Inc. has been filed with Susan Mills, PUCO staff, filed by B. Ferris.0
04/22/1993Copy of latest bill insert which notified customers of the services and discounts available to the impaired and as to how the impaired can apply for and use, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by J. Troup.0
03/23/1993Revised tariff, PUCO No. 1, 1st page 32, filed on behalf of Communique Telecommunications, Inc. dba Logicall by C. Helein.0
02/05/1993Revised tariff, PUCO No. 1, 19th page 1, 2nd page 16.1, 1st page 16.2, filed on behalf of Cable & Wireless North America, Inc. by D. Zolnierowicz.0
02/05/1993Revised tariff, PUCO No. 1, title page; Check Sheet - page 1; page 20, filed on behalf of Metropolitan Fiber Systems of Cleveland, Inc. by C. Rohe.0
02/05/1993Revised tariff, PUCO No. 1, title page; Check Sheet - page 1; page 20, filed on behalf of Metropolitan Fiber Systems of Columbus, Inc. by C. Rohe.0
02/03/1993Revised tariff, PUCO No. 1, Check Sheet 1st sheet 2; 1st sheet 27, original sheet 29.1, original sheet 29.2, filed on behalf of U.S. Osiris Corporation by H. Stringer.0
02/03/1993Corrected tariff, PUCO No. 1, Section 2 - 2nd sheet 25.1, filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunications Corp. by K. Richardson.0
02/03/1993Tariff, PUCO No. 1, original sheets 6.3 and 6.4, filed on behalf of Americom Communications, Inc. by P. Segi.0
 
1 /  24 
      
      
Attorney General:
Henkener,Ann
Attorney Examiner: