DIS - Case Record for 08-0254-EL-CSS Skip to main content

Case Record For:

08-0254-EL-CSS

File a Public Comment
Case Title: BRUSH WELLMAN INC VS TOLEDO EDISON COMPANY
Status: CL-CLOSED
Industry Code: EL-ELECTRIC
Purpose Code: CSS-Complaint on service or safety
Date Opened: 3/14/2008
Date Closed: 4/20/2018
Printable Docket Card Service List
View All
1 - 15 of 50 documents 1 /  4 
Date FiledSummaryPages
04/20/2018Case action form closing case(s) effective 04/20/2018 - electronically filed by Sandra Coffey on behalf of Megan Addison, Attorney Examiner, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio.2
12/22/2011Supreme Court Document The following decision, announcement or notice of action by the Supreme Court of Ohio with respect to this case is provided solely for the information and convenience of the reader, and should not be construed as a part of the record of this case before the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, and may be subject to formal revision before it is published in the Ohio Official Reports. The Court’s opinions from 1992 to the present are available online from the Reporter of Decisions at http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/ROD/ - Slip Opinion (Aug. 25, 2011) [Cite as Martin Marietta Magnesia Specialties, L.L.C. v. Pub. Util. Comm., 129 Ohio St.3d 485, 2011-Ohio-4189.] electronically filed by Kimberly L Keeton on behalf of Public Utilities Commission of Ohio17
07/13/2009Supreme Court Transmittal papers filed. (S.C. No. 09-1072)8
07/13/2009Service Notice.2
07/02/2009Joint motion to consolidate appeals filed by C. Smith on behalf of Kraft Foods Global, Inc.; by M. Dortch on behalf of Martin Marietta Magnesia Specialties, LLC; by T. O'Brien on behalf of Worthington Industries and Brush Wellman; by M. Hayden and J. Lang on behalf of The Toledo Edison Company; by S. Parrot on behalf of PUCO; by D. Grodhaus on behalf of The Calphalon Corporation.6
06/12/2009Notice of appeal of appellant Brush Wellman, Inc. filed by T. O'Brien. (09-1072)34
04/15/2009Service notice.2
04/15/2009Entry ordering the complainants' joint application for rehearing be denied. Concurring opinion of Commissioner Paul A. Centolella.9
03/30/2009Respondent's memorandum in opposition to complainants' joint application for rehearing filed by J. Lang on behalf of the Toledo Edison Company. 8
03/20/2009Complainants' joint application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Worthington Industries and Brush Wellman, Inc. by T. O'Brien, on behalf of Calphalon Corporation by D. Grodhaus, on behalf of Kraft Foods Global, Inc. by C. Smith and on behalf of Martin Marietta Magnesia Specialty Materials, LLC by M. Dortch.8
02/19/2009Service notice.2
02/19/2009Opinion and order that this case be dismissed.20
09/26/2008Reply brief of respondent, The Toledo Edison Company filed by J. Lang.16
09/26/2008Joint reply of complainants filed by T. O'Brien on behalf of Worthington Industries, Brush Willman, Inc. and Pilkington North America, Inc; D. Grodhaus on behalf of Calphalon Corporation; C. Smith on behalf of Kraft Foods Global, Inc.; and M. Dortch on behalf of Martin Marietta Magnesia Specialty Materials, LLC.16
09/24/2008Service Notice2
 
1 /  4 
      
      
Attorney General:
Attorney Examiner:
Pirik,Christine M.T.