Case Record For: 07-1255-EL-CSS File a Public Comment Case Title: SUNOCO INC. (R&M) VS THE TOLEDO EDISON CO. Status: CL-CLOSED Industry Code: EL-ELECTRIC Purpose Code: CSS-Complaint on service or safety Date Opened: 12/6/2007 Date Closed: 4/20/2018 Case Documents Public Comments Parties of Record Related Cases Printable Docket Card Service List View All 1 - 15 of 47 documents 1 / 4 Date FiledSummaryPages 04/20/2018Case action form closing case(s) effective 04/20/2018 - electronically filed by Sandra Coffey on behalf of Megan Addison, Attorney Examiner, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio.2 12/22/2011Supreme Court Document The following decision, announcement or notice of action by the Supreme Court of Ohio with respect to this case is provided solely for the information and convenience of the reader, and should not be construed as a part of the record of this case before the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, and may be subject to formal revision before it is published in the Ohio Official Reports. The Court’s opinions from 1992 to the present are available online from the Reporter of Decisions at http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/ROD/ - Slip Opinion (June 9, 2011) [Cite as Sunoco, Inc. (R&M) v. Toledo Edison Co., 129 Ohio St.3d 397, 2011-Ohio-2720.] electronically filed by Kimberly L Keeton on behalf of Public Utilities Commission of Ohio30 06/15/2009Supreme Court Transmittal papers filed. (S.C. 09-880)7 06/15/2009Service notice.2 05/14/2009Supreme Court Appeal 09-880 filed on behalf of Sunoco, Inc. (R&M).25 04/15/2009Service notice.2 04/15/2009Entry ordering Sunoco's application for rehearing be denied.8 03/30/2009Respondent's memorandum in opposition to complainant's application for rehearing filed by J. Lang on behalf of the Toledo Edison Company. 9 03/19/2009Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Sunoco, Inc. (R&M) by D. Boehm. 12 02/19/2009Service notice.2 02/19/2009Opinion and order that the complaint be dismissed.12 09/24/2008Letter agreeing to and extension of time to file the reply briefs in this matter until July 23, filed by D. Boehm on behalf of both parties. 1 09/24/2008Letter noting that the actual date agreed upon by Mark Hayden for the filing of reply briefs in this matter is July 30, not July 23, filed by D. Boehm. 1 08/04/2008Reply brief on behalf of Sunoco Inc. (R&M) filed by D. Boehm.12 07/31/2008Reply brief of complainant Sunoco, Inc. (R&M) filed by D. Boehm. (FAX) (document filed on 7/30/08)12 1 / 4 Attorney General: Attorney Examiner: Pirik,Christine M.T.