DIS - Case Record for 04-0440-TP-UNC Skip to main content

Case Record For:

04-0440-TP-UNC

File a Public Comment
Case Title: GLANDORF TELEPHONE COMPANY
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: UNC-Unclassified
Date Opened: 3/31/2004
Date Closed: 1/25/2008
Printable Docket Card Service List
View All
1 - 15 of 45 documents 1 /  3 
Date FiledSummaryPages
01/25/2008Case Action Form electronically filed by Erin E. Scribner on behalf of Public Utilities Commission of Ohio2
01/22/2008Withdrawal of Todd M. Rodgers and the substitution of Mark S. Yurick and John W. Bentine as counsel of record for Verizon Wireless filed by J. Bentine.4
12/19/2007Service Notice2
12/19/2007Third Supplemental Finding and Order ordering that wireless carriers seeking intermodal LNP in the applicants' service territories comply with Finding (9); that the applicable applicants provide intermodal LNP within 90 days of receiving a BFR; that Buckland is granted additional time to satisfy its intermodal obligations consistent with Finding (10). 7
10/25/2006Letter on behalf of Glandorf Telephone Co., Inc. regarding the hardware and software to meet both state and federal requirements for Local Number Portability, filed by L. Heckman.1
02/23/2005Second supplemental finding and order stating that the applicants motion of January 20, 2005 is granted; that the applicant comply with the applicable time frames; that the designated companies provide quarterly updates until such time that the switch replacements or upgrades occur.8
02/23/2005Service Notice2
02/23/2005Service Notice2
02/22/2005Notice of supplemental filing filed on behalf of applicants by D. Ferris and P. Schudel.6
01/20/2005Confidential document; Motion for protection treatment filed by D. Ferris.1
01/20/2005Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed by D. Ferris.5
01/20/2005Motion to amend the supplemental finding and order filed by D. Ferris.6
12/22/2004Service Notice1
12/21/2004Supplemental Finding and Order ordering that the applications for suspension of intertidal LNP obligations are denied in accordance with the provisions of this Finding and Order; that the applicable ILECs as addressed in findings (13) and (14) file with the FCC for a determination of the pertinent LNP surcharge,that the applicable ILECs supplement their respective applications consistent with Finding(12),that the other ILECs identified in Finding(13) file with the FCC for a determination of the pertinent LNP surcharge at te designated time.17
07/20/2004Service Notice1
 
1 /  3 
      
      
Attorney General:
Attorney Examiner: