Skip to main content

Case Record For:

01-0678-TP-CSS

File a Public Comment
Case Title: CENTENNIAL COMM vs SPRINT
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: CSS-Complaint on service or safety
Date Opened: 3/20/2001 1:00:00 AM
Date Closed: 6/6/2001
Printable Docket Card Service List
View All
1 - 10 of 10 documents 1 /  1 
Date FiledSummaryPages
06/06/2001Service Notice.1
06/06/2001Entry dismissing this complaint and closing the case of record.2
05/25/2001Notice of dismissal filed on behalf of complainant by S. Bloomfield.2
04/12/2001Motion for admission pro hac vice of Karlyn D. Stanley and Kevin C. Halm filed by S. Bloomfield on behalf of Centennial3
04/11/2001Memorandum contra the motion to dismiss of United Telephone Company d/b/a Sprint filed by A. Straker Bartemes on behalf of Centennial Communications Corp.13
04/03/2001Answer filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint, by J. Stewart.8
04/03/2001Motion to dismiss and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint, by J. Stewart.22
03/28/2001Entry ordering Sprint/United to file its answer by 4/3/01; a telephone conference be held on 4/5/01 at 10:00 a.m. (AE)3
03/21/2001Complaint letter and copy of complaint mailed to: Joseph Stewart, Sprint; and Rebecca Donahue, Sprint.1
03/20/2001In the matter of the complaint of Centennial Michiana License Company LLC dba Centennial Communications Corp. (vs) United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint relative to the alleged unjust and unlawful breach of the interconnection agreement.103
 
1 /  1 
      
      
Attorney General:
Attorney Examiner:
Farkas, Scott